331
1
the financial questions remaining open and this avoiding reference in future numerous unconnected papers.
170701
Will be found returns
A
comally sent with the Estimates. There is a comparative statement of the Revenue received in the past, and expected in the coming year
The figures appear
? helly to justify the Estimate for 1881, and I have little operis, the estimate will be exceeded. I Sir J. Hammery doubt that, as fir). Henne
With reference to this comparative statement I have not an incidental remark to make.
It appears from it that those are not returns received from the Supreme Court is actual 18 probath Estimeer
$14 14000 on of alterationing & 6. Exe fa 20360 80
Statement in 17070 shows that is but little difference between the Estimates for 1881 and those for 1880. The net difference is almost exactly accounted for the increase of $25,000 in the Public Works vote and the decrease $4,000 in Police in 1880 on account of the cost and $11,000 of steam band launches.
three new Une details of the difference (of which, by the way, Interment such as but out the Hit of such 1 tatene.-/ the Estimates for 1890 there is not any that which accompanis are trivial.
I think so I need only note the following:
Provision is made (f. 13) for three any Por by the Sheriff of the Fees of count received. one of the Thin Leas indique defects in c.e. ha a given vity $47 but alt which the Raport k the Extr whats It. Defuleation Committer was directed.
1890 14 only $1 bhar for thin aceting and Audit the against
Turning to the Expenditure. Une comparating this date the rete cadets (two in England) and for quartin in Hong Kong. I write at a distance pour Downing Street, and do not rememb whether it was intended to cachets in place qm. appoint two new
Page 331 appears to be a part of a larger document discussing financial estimates and expenditures. The text includes various numerical values and references to specific documents or sections (e.g., "170701", "f. 13"). The content is related to financial planning and analysis for the year 1881, comparing it with the previous year, 1880.
Page information is kept as is.
331
1
the financial questions remaining open
and this avoiding reference in future
numerous unconnected papers.
170701
Will be found returns
A
comally sent with the Estimates. There
is a comparative statement of the Reven
received in the past, and expected in the
coming year
The figures appear
?
helly to justify
the Estimate for 4881, and
I hawn little
operis, the estimate will be exceeded. I
Sir J. Hammery doubt that, as fir). Henne
With
Lyference
to this comparative statemen
I have not an incidental remark to make.
It appears from it that those are not
returns received from the Supreme Cout
is actual 18 probath Estimeer
je
$14
14000
on of alterationing
&
6.
Exe fa
20360
80
Statement in 17070 shows that is but
little differance between the Estimates for
1881 and those for 1880. Un net "difference is almost exactly accountext for
5
the increase of $25,000
W
the Public
Works vote and the decrease 44,000
th
Police
in 1880
on account of this cost and
$11,000, of
steam band launches.
three new
Une details of the difference (of
which, by the way,
Interment such as
but out the Hit of such
1
tatene.-/
the Estimates for
1890
there is not any
that which accompanis
are trivial.
I think so I need only note the
following:
Porvision is made (f. 13) for three
any
Por
by
the Sheriff of the Fees ofcount received.
one of the Thin Leas
indiente defects in
c.e. ha
a given
vity $47
but alt
which the Raport k
the Extr
whats It. Defuleation Committer
was directed.
1890 14 only $1 bhar
for thin
aceting and Audit the against
Turning to the Expenditure. Une comparating this date
the rete
cadets (two in England)
and for quartin
in Hong Kong. I write at
a distance pour Downing Street, and do
not rememb
whether it was intended to
cachets in place qm.
appoint two new
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.